So, now that Bob Woodward has joined the Valerie Plame leak fiasco, the game gets that much more interesting. Respected journalists and publications are going down in flames. Woodward knows about this for two years but doesn't bother to tell any of his superiors at the Post (not his source, but that he also was given this information)? He writes and talks and gives his opinion of the investigation over the past two years while all the time he's part of it? Wow. Ben Bradlee is quoted as saying he doesn't think anybody outside the beltway is interested in this story. He's wrong.
This story goes much deeper than what we know right now. If the real truth comes out it will only be because Fitzgerald was able to dig deep enough, and there isn't a decision to withhold the truth until later because of national security.
Now current and former administration personnel are coming out of the woodwork to say they weren't the ones to tell Woodward. One has to ask who the source was, though? One thinks back on the promotional tours for Woodward's last book and how he talked about who he interviewed for the book.
Yes. I do recall now how Woodward crowed about how he interviewed Pres. Bush one-on-one in the Oval Office.
1 comment:
If you really want to dive into this Woodward business, check out Jane at firedoglakeProbing stuff from a lawyer. She is very good and well worth a read. But she is prodigious.
I can't muster the energy she has to dive into the sleezy world of White House/journalist relations.
Post a Comment